Added: Jamail Richey - Date: 08.11.2021 05:40 - Views: 11086 - Clicks: 6108
Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. Oakland University, ude. For many individuals, involvement in casual sexual activities begins during adolescence Manning, Longmore, and Giordano Similar to prior studies e. Moreover, involvement in casual sexual activities is even more common as individuals transition from adolescence to young adulthood. Taken together these studies suggest that casual sex appears to be relatively common among contemporary young adults in the U.
We move beyond prior work by examining the motivations and implications of casual sex among young adults drawing on the TARS data, and relying on life course theory and a mixed-methods approach. This research contributes to the literatures on casual sex and young adulthood in at least four ways.
First, few studies have considered motivations for casual sexual activity from a life course perspective. The benefit of a life course approach is that it may provide unique insight into why young adults participate in casual sexual behavior. Second, many studies were limited to college samples e. Third, our mixed method approach allows us to investigate self-described meanings, which are not possible with standardized surveys.
Lastly, understanding the motivations for casual sex can inform health care and service providers who work with the young adult population. Specifically, understanding why young adults participate in casual sex behavior can lead to better intervention strategies that encourage healthy sexual decision making. Johnson, Crosnoe, and Elder state that two important themes in life course theory are 1 the ificance of historical change, and 2 continuity in life pathways. Societal changes that have influenced the life course stage of early adulthood include increased enrollment in higher education, more time spent outside the parental home, and delayed marriage and childbearing Fussell and Furstenberg Moreover, these societal changes may be associated with increased casual sexual activity among young adults.
For example, Hamilton and Armstrong argued that some female college students did not want serious committed relationships, in part, because the time commitment of having boyfriends could distract from studying. Thus, prior research has shown that there has been societal changes that have created new roles and behaviors associated with the young adult stage in the life course. We expect that if young adults do not feel that they have the time for more committed relationships, they may be more motivated to have casual sex as an outlet for sexual behavior without the time commitment of romantic relationships.
The second important theme of life course theory is the focus on continuity of pathways; that is, behaviors and experiences that Adult wants sex encounter Ohio occurred during adolescence may influence young adult events and behaviors Elder Raley, Crissey, and Mullerbased on the Add Health data, reported that casual sexual experiences during the teen years were associated with transitioning into cohabiting unions during young adulthood.
Less research has been conducted on casual sexual behavior beyond the adolescent or young adult periods or how young adult casual sexual relationships have influenced sexual activity and union formation later in the life course. We expect that prior romantic and sexual experiences will underlie motivations for young adult casual sex.
As young adults anticipate transitioning into roles related to adulthood, such as those associated with marriage, they may be less likely to participate in casual sex. Shanahan et al. Further, Arnett notes that when young adults were finically independent from their parents they were more likely to feel like an adult. We expect that if young adults feel too young to be tied down, a measure of subjective identity, they will be more likely to engage in casual sex behavior.
Thus, the life course perspective Adult wants sex encounter Ohio our view that young adulthood is a unique life stage with associated roles and behaviors that will influence the motivations for casual sex behavior. Prior research has focused on general motives for participating in casual sex. First, consistent with a risk behavior approach, some studies have emphasized the role of substance use e. Grello et al. Owen et al. Moreover, this was particularly the case for men in their sample. Conversely, the students in the Garcia and Reiber study reported that peer pressure was not a strong predictor for hooking up, but men were slightly more likely to claim that peer pressure was a motivation for hooking up compared to women.
Summarizing, conventional motivations for casual sexual activity included substance use, sexual satisfaction, and perhaps peer influence. As such, we expect our sample respondents to endorse these motivations for casual sex as well. Some motives for casual sex are more reflective of the young adult stage in the life course.
Demographic research has emphasized that young adulthood is characterized by geographic mobility, enrollment in higher education, and employment changes Mouw ; Osgood et al. Thus, our investigation of motivations for casual sex considers these demographic and social psychological life course specific considerations.
We examine how characteristics of young adulthood, such as geographic movement and not feeling like an adult, might influence engaging in casual sex activity. While young adulthood is a life stage in which casual sex is common, it is also a stage in which committed relationships of longer duration become more salient to individuals Giordano et al.
These patterns, we argue, are not necessarily contradictory. In a recent longitudinal analysis of the TARS data examining the casual sex trajectories of adolescents as they aged into early young adulthood, the of romantic partners was correlated ificantly with the of casual sex partners over time Lyons et al. Nevertheless, researchers who study casual sexual activity have not examined fully whether involvement in more serious romantic relationships and casual sex are related for an exception see Hamilton and Armstrong The current study moves beyond research by examining how prior romantic relationships can act as a motivator for casual sex as opposed to just an alternative to committed relationships.
Prior investigations of the implications of casual sex typically have focused on the negative consequences of casual sex, such as feelings of regret, poorer relationship quality, depressive symptoms, reputational concerns, and lower educational attainment e. In a study of female college students, those who engaged in casual sex, compared with those who did not, were more likely to report feelings of regret Eshbaugh and Gute Consistent with these findings, Grello et Adult wants sex encounter Ohio. In contrast, Eisenberg et al.
One exception was that male respondents who were in a committed relationship reported slightly more depressive symptoms compared to male respondents whose last sexual experience was with a casual partner. Although much of the literature on the implications of casual sex has focused on negative consequences, the high levels of casual sexual activity and more liberal sex attitudes of young adults Lefkowitz suggests that all experiences may not be associated with negative outcomes.
Based on prior research Lyons et al. Examining adolescents, prior research based on the TARS has documented that a substantial minority felt closer with partners after having casual sex, and casual sex was sometimes the beginning of a relationship of longer duration Manning et al. While building on prior work, which has focused on negative implications of casual sex, we examine how young adults, themselves, describe the consequences of casual sex, recognizing that these experiences may be viewed as having negative and positive consequences.
For analysis purposes, although we conceptualize motives and implications of casual sexual activity as distinct, we acknowledge that in many instances these overlap. For example, to the degree that individuals believe that friends approve of such liaisons, they may be more likely to engage in casual sex, and may be more likely to perceive that they gained peer approval.
Similarly, individuals may be motivated by desires to avoid being hurt - and subsequently enjoy sexual relationships that do not require commitment. However, it is possible that the consequences that unfold are not as expected as in the case of individuals who develop unanticipated stronger feelings for the partner, even though they expected the relationship to be casual. Thus, it is important to study both motivations for and implications of casual sex behavior because motivations can influence implications.
If the implications of past casual sex experiences are either positive or negative, they can alter future motivations for casual sexual behavior. Researchers have reported that gender is critical in investigating the motivations for and implications of casual sex e. Men have tended to report more frequent casual sex experiences Lyons et al. Further, there are potential gender differences in the motivation for participating in casual sex. Regan and Dreyer reported in a study of college students that men were more likely to claim status among friends as a reason for participating in casual sex, and women were more likely to participate in casual sex because of mutual feelings of attraction and friendship.
Using an online survey of undergraduate students, England et al. Owen and Fincham reported that women were more likely to claim negative emotional reactions to hooking up, but both men and women claimed the hook up experience to be mostly positive. Yet, women, more so than men, may be judged harshly by peers if they have many sex partners Kreager and Staff In this study, we draw on structured surveys and in-depth qualitative interviews with a large, heterogeneous sample of young adults and examine the motivations for and implications of casual sex during this phase of the life course.
In the section, we provide a descriptive portrait of casual sex attitudes and behaviors of all young adults in our sample. Next, we outline conventional motivations for casual sex among a subsample who had a recent casual sex experience. We conceptualize these motivations as conventional because they were reported as important in prior research.
Subsequently, we highlight motivations for casual sex that are associated with the characteristics of early young adulthood. We rely on prior research, which studies the characteristics of early young adulthood, and examine how these qualities influence casual sexual behavior during this stage in the life course. Finally, we investigate both negative and positive implications of casual sex behavior.
The first interview was collected inbased on a random sample of youths in the 7 th9 thand 11 th grades in Lucas County, Ohio. The second interview was collected in and the third interview in The geographic area of Lucas County was similar to estimates of race and ethnicity, family income, and education to the national population; however, national estimates could not be determined with the TARS dataset. The first interview included a sample of 1, youths as well as a parent or guardian interviewed separately.
School records were used for the sampling frame, but school attendance was not required for inclusion in the sample. This strategy ensured that questions that may be more sensitive, such as casual sexual behavior, cannot be overheard by other members of the household.
There was an oversampling of Adult wants sex encounter Ohio minority youth. All young adults were asked questions about casual sex attitudes and behaviors. Respondents without a recent casual sexual experience were not asked motivation questions.
Thus, our analytic sample for the quantitative analyses is limited to the respondents who had a recent casual sex experience. A comparison group included respondents who scored average on the mentioned risk factors. These interviews generally occurred at different times than the survey interviews, and were completed from August to August The goal of these interviews, in comparison to the survey data, was to create relationship narratives where respondents would self-describe their romantic and sexual history and their views of the meaning of these relationships.
In all instances, precautions were taken to ensure confidentiality and the ability of the respondent to speak candidly about their relationships and experiences. The interviewer had over 20 years of experience in conducting interviews of this type, and sought out quiet areas within the home, Adult wants sex encounter Ohio the front porch or back yard, as well as her car, in instances in which there was the possibility that another family member or partner might listen to the interview.
Some of the qualitative interviews took place in public places family restaurant, library when it was apparent that no private places were available within the home.
The interviewer also was adept at stopping the interview or speaking in a coded manner, if another family member unexpectedly entered the area where the interview took place. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis.
While all of the interviews were useful, because of their salience to the overall research questions, we focused particular attention on the subsample of 44 respondents who discussed casual sexual relationships. These in-depth interviews were not meant to generalize to the population, but allowed us to highlight the perceived motivations for and implications of casual sex for a sample of young adults who had engaged in these casual sexual relationships.
The qualitative sample was similar to the quantitative samples on key demographic characteristics See Appendix Table. All of our respondents fit our profile of high risk because they reported casual sexual activity at the time of interview.
Thus, the qualitative responses are not representative of young adults Adult wants sex encounter Ohio Lucas County, but provide in-depth and rare insight into young adult motivations for casual sex. The TARS data were appropriate for the research questions for several reasons. First, the data provided detailed measurement of the motivations for casual sexual behavior, which were not available in larger national datasets. Second, in-depth qualitative interviews permitted individuals to describe in their own words what they saw as motives for and implications of their casual sexual experiences.
Finally, much prior research on casual sex is based on college samples. In contrast, TARS respondents did not have to attend high school classes to be included in the survey. Individuals who were not attending high school during the time of the first interview may have had different educational and casual sex trajectories at later interviews. The analysis of the quantitative data relied on t-tests to determine gender differences and similarities in the motivations for and implication of casual sex. The first step of the analysis of the qualitative data was based on a careful reading of the interviews followed by open-coding with special attention to motivations for and implications of casual sexual experiences.
After the initial reading of the interviews and with the research questions in mind, the researchers constructed a preliminary code list. Next, the transcribed texts and code list were downloaded into the qualitative database Atlas ti. The researchers then coded the data based on the code list. All the researchers coded the same interview and compared codes to establish inter-coder reliability, and discussed any coding discrepancies. The codes for motivations and implications were organized and classified so that broader themes emerged and were assessed.
The qualitative instrument included questions about sexual relationships outside of dating relationships. If the respondent indicated that they had casual sex, they were asked to elaborate on such relationships.
The TARS included several survey items on casual sex, which allowed for systematic comparisons by gender. The young adults in the sample were asked two specific questions about their most recent casual sex partner. Measures assessed the following five types of conventional motives: sexual, substance use, relationship-based, and peer pressure. There is one life course specific motivation in the quantitative analysis: age and Adult wants sex encounter Ohio. Measures assessed the following perceived implications of casual sexual activity: peer acceptance, regret, and closeness with partner.
Two questions measured peer acceptance of the relationship. Race and ethnicity was measured by how the respondents self-identified. Age was a continuous measure. The relationship context of casual sex varied considerably. In Table 2the mean of 4.
Men and women were equally likely to report having sex with an ex not shown. Outlined below are two sets of motivations for casual sex behavior. We note that these motivations are not mutually exclusive.Adult wants sex encounter Ohio
email: [email protected] - phone:(594) 819-1525 x 5503
Young Adult Casual Sexual Behavior: Life Course Specific Motivations and Consequences